top of page

SMART Reporting...taking the Reader on a Journey of Discovery

When individuals find themselves in situations where physical intervention becomes necessary, the need to be accountable and what occurred actions come to the forefront.


The ethical and moral implications surrounding the use of force demand a careful examination of one's actions and the context in which they occurred.


Accountability in such circumstances involves taking responsibility for one's actions.

It requires a reflective analysis of the event, acknowledging the role you played, and being willing to face the consequences, if any, arising from those actions.


This process often involves an introspective assessment of whether the use of physical force was truly necessary and proportionate to the perceived threat perceived.


Justification, on the other hand, revolves around establishing the validity and legality of the actions taken.


In many cases, the justification for using physical force relies on the concept of self-defence or defence of others.


This justification hinges upon the reasonable belief that there was an imminent threat of harm, and the force used was necessary to repel or mitigate that threat.


For individuals in enforcement or security roles, the principles of accountability and justification are further intertwined with their professional responsibilities.


The use of force in these scenarios is typically governed by specific protocols and guidelines designed to ensure accountability and the lawful application of force.


However, regardless of the context, the assessment of accountability and justification after a physical altercation is rarely straightforward.


Factors like the adrenaline rush, psychological impact, and the rapid nature of events can influence the perception and decision-making process in high-stress situations.


Post-incident procedures and investigations play a pivotal role in establishing the accountability and justification of your actions taken.


These processes involve a thorough examination of the circumstances leading to the use of force, witness statements, available evidence, and an assessment of whether the response was proportionate to the threat faced.


Accountability doesn't solely rest on the individual directly involved in using force.


It extends to the systems, training, and support mechanisms in place to equip individuals with the necessary skills to handle such situations responsibly.


Adequate training, proper protocols, and support for mental health and emotional well-being are essential components of fostering accountability within any organisation.


Today, where accountability and transparency are increasingly demanded, the handling of incidents involving the use of force is under significant scrutiny.


Calls for accountability are often accompanied by demands for transparency, seeking to ensure that investigations are fair, unbiased, and conducted with integrity.


Ultimately, the nexus between accountability and justification in cases involving the use of physical force underscores the importance of evaluating each situation based on its unique circumstances.


It demands a delicate balance between acknowledging the gravity of using force and recognising the imperative to defend oneself or others when faced with imminent danger.


Striving for accountability while ensuring the justifiability of actions remains an ongoing ethical challenge, necessitating continuous reflection, learning, and improvements.




Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page